🔗 Share this article

Via an per curiam ruling, the U.S. Supreme Court permitted Texas to employ a newly configured congressional map that could add several five additional Republican-leaning districts. The six-to-three order, handed down on Thursday, upholds a appeal by the state to overturn a lower court's ruling that had invalidated the boundaries in November.

Court's Explanation

The district court wrongly interjected itself into an active primary campaign, creating much confusion and disrupting the fine balance of power in elections, the justices wrote in detailing its decision.

The district court had previously found that Texas had likely classified voters by their race – a act known as illegal race-based districting – when it enacted the new maps. It had mandated the state to use the maps established after the most recent national count for the forthcoming election.

Sharp Opposition

In a sharply worded objection, Justice Elena Kagan criticized the court's decision. She contended that it disregarded the work of the lower court, observing that its opinion was crafted by a judge nominated by former President Donald Trump.

While our court is superior in jurisdiction, we are not superior in making these fact-intensive determinations, Kagan wrote in a opinion joined by Justices Sonia Sotomayor and Ketanji Brown Jackson.

The justice went on, The majority's order ensures that Texas's redistricting plan, with all its increased favoritism, will dictate next year's elections. And it guarantees that many Texas residents, for no good reason, will be sorted in electoral districts due to their race. And that result, as this court has pronounced consistently, is a violation of the U.S. Constitution.

Countrywide Map-Drawing Battle

The court's action occurs during a countrywide battle over the remapping of electoral maps. Texas is a key piece in efforts to transform the U.S. House map to bolster a fragile Republican control. Usually, boundary revision happens after a ten-year survey. Yet the move by Texas Republicans to initiate a bold mid-cycle redistricting earlier this year sparked a series of events among other states.

Conservative legislators in including North Carolina and Missouri have also enacted redistricting plans that are estimated to yield a number of additional GOP-friendly seats. Democrats, for their part, have countered with their own plans in including California and Virginia, which could offset those potential gains.

Political Responses

The Texas top lawyer hailed the supreme court ruling. In a comment, he said the order protected Texas's basic authority to draw a map that guarantees representation favorable to Republicans. Texas is paving the way as we take our country back, district by district, state by state, he remarked.

Conversely, Democratic officials decried the ruling. It is deeply disheartening that the Court has endorsed this severely racially gerrymandered plan from Texas Republicans, said the leader of a major party election organization.

Another senior House figure argued the court had once again eroded its legitimacy by rubber-stamping a race-based map. Tonight's ruling by far-right justices on the supreme court is further proof that the extremists will do anything to rig the midterm elections. The gerrymandered Texas congressional map is a partisan and racially discriminatory power grab designed to subvert the will of the voters – particularly in Black and Latino communities, he added.