🔗 Share this article

It's Black History Month in the UK, and it appears it’s time for a reassessment. Over the years, an observance that started out as a commemorative event of heritage, traditions and links between Black populations worldwide, has adopted a commercial tone, expanding to include events where African descendants are paid to talk to white audiences about “unconscious bias” and active solidarity. The anti-racism rallies of the last decade generated a rise in the enterprise of demonstrating racial awareness. But even that moment has passed. The tide has crested, leaving a sort of hollowed out legacy of what increasing understanding is for.

The Origins of Black History Celebration

First commemorated in the US and Canada, Black History Month was conceived in 1962 as “Negro History Week” by Black scholar Carter G. Woodson with a week of celebration and reflection in the February's second week. Black History Month grew out of this campaign and was officially launched in 1970. Now it is celebrated not only in the United States and Canada in the second month, but also in the tenth month in the United Kingdom, Deutschland, Éire and the Netherlands.

The month has transformed since its inception, placing less emphasis on the histories of colonial slavery and fights for racial justice, and more on notable African descendants in politics, culture, and activism, and widely honoring the input Black people have made to shape the country. It is in schools where Black History Month is most regularly observed, with talks and cultural events. But the manner the month is commemorated is a reflection of the contemporary political context. How it develops is a instructive case in how assimilation leads to erosion: the reshaping of Black History Month has impeded the objective of it, which is to confront systemic and institutional racism.

---

A Troubling Time

Hardly anything shows how important it is to reconsider Black History Month better than the particular moment in which it falls this year. In the Britain, a resurgent right in the guise of the Reform party is ahead in surveys. In the warmer months we saw the largest far-right rally in the UK's past. a prominent political figure, the person of color at the helm of the Tory party, is a firm opponent of the racial justice movement, and we are in a place where a legislator gains confidence to state that the absence of Caucasian individuals in parts of a city is a cause for alarm. Simultaneously, far-right parties are growing in the EU as a complete entity.

In the United States, a colossal assault against inclusion programs and preferential policies has been brought, repeatedly with positive outcomes, to the top legal institutions of the country. A drive to erase Black history and experience from the records is in progress. One of the former president's first executive orders targeted the National Museum of African American History and Culture, and the renowned cultural organization, alleging that they of a “concerted and widespread effort to rewrite our Nation’s history” by representing the nation “as fundamentally prejudiced”.

Against this backdrop, the observance illustrates how insufficiently it can be impactful if it is restricted to either obligatory business commemorations, or depoliticized commemorations of contributions in the past, rather than challenging the situation of the present. It also demonstrates how its limited duration means that it is separated from the more extensive continuous action that is required. Denise Miller, a prof at an educational institution, put it best when she raised concerns about the fleeting superficial actions of the celebration. “The issue with taking a tokenistic approach”, she stated, “is that it typically leads to that Black History Month turns into a brief show rather than a catalyst for change.”

---

Rethinking, But Not Jettisoning

Determining how to adapt, revise and extend actions for equal rights and acknowledgment in such times of discouragement and concern is a difficult task. There is a inclination to just do away with things like Black History Month entirely, believing they are no longer suitable, or are remnants of an time that has failed to deliver.

Yet, in spite of all this, Black History Month, and in fact the complete comprehensive structure and heritage of activism for racial justice – local anti-racism groups, DEI programs, and certainly, even commercial engagements – form an framework that a considerable labor has been dedicated to. It is there not merely to decline as the politics moves on (and in fact, regresses), but to be a dynamic entity.

So what would a new dynamic Black History Month appear as? Well, first, it would be more than a single focused period: something that is distributed through the year (as various establishments are already commencing), parts of its content (particularly around historic Black characters) incorporated into school curriculums. It would also be a era that does not evade governmental matters, and provides room for people, particularly young people, to share their anxieties and narratives. What use is mere awareness of the bygone era when it ignores the present reality of ultra-nationalist gatherings in the street? Institutions who observe it should not be comforted with the passive language of implicit prejudice and awareness of minor insults, but challenged by the threats that affect everyone if opposition to discrimination is not treated with importance. To summarize, Black History Month should be made current, critical, and responsive. It could be that an total re-identification is in order – Black History is Now Month.